Image of the Ideacity Mars colony concept. Credits: InnSpace / humanMars.net
A team of friends in Poland who happen to be architects, roboticists and makers decided to do something cosmic: they created InnSpace, a project literally out of this world. And by the way, they decided to apply their creative talents to the Mars Colony Prize Competition commissioned by the Mars Society last year. Their entry called Ideacity, a Mars settlement of the near future, won 5th prize.
To ensure the colony was designed with a diverse range of viewpoints, the team interviewed 167 experts from various backgrounds. They asked pertinent questions on political issues, services delivered from Earth and social aspects that would affect the design and organization of the colony. The results helped them to improve the concept, but they also found that technology will not completely replace human beings.
Image credit: Richard Bizley, bizelyart.com / National Space Society
In a paper published in New Space last March, Peter Hague describes a figure of merit he developed to drive policy decisions to help accelerate space exploration and space settlement. The aim of the paper was to generate a single metric for every potential space mission on a common scale for comparison purposes. This ‘mass value’ is the amount of mass that would need to be placed in low Earth orbit (LEO) to perform the same mission using a baseline method. That method would use only storable propellants and Hohmann transfer orbits – no gravity assists, aerocapture, high energy propellants or ISRU.
This approach puts a price on all the add-ons which expand the mission beyond the baseline. One can then use a single normalized scale to calculate how much mass to LEO you would save by making propellant on Mars for example, or by taking advantage of a certain launch window to get a gravity assist.
A hands-off government entity could subsidize space expenditures at a flat rate per kg of mass value, confident they are promoting space development without having legislators involved in engineering decisions.
Aggregating all the missions by a nation, company, or other entity could be used to calculate an analogue of GDP for a space civilization. While this does not measure everything we care about – scientific merit, human occupation, etc – neither does GDP. It does capture the overall capability to move around the solar system; and as such, is as useful for charting our journey to becoming a Type II civilization on the Kardashev Scale as it is for analyzing individual missions.
Thanks to Peter Hague for the material in this post. We’ve heard a rumor that there may be a book forthcoming on the subject. Looking forward to it!
The crewed asteroid exploration vehicle NEO Robotic Friend in two different operational modes. Credits: Luca Levrino, et al.*
In a paper presented at the 65th International Astronautical Congress, Toronto, Canada in 2014 and posted to Acedemia.edu, a team of students* from Italy and Germany discuss an innovative small unpressurised vehicle designed for mobility and maximization of human agility for safe crewed exploration of near earth asteroids (NEA). They named their brainchild NEA Robotic Friend (NRF).
Though conceived when NASA was focused on the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) architecture with the emphasis on developing technology to expand beyond the Moon toward eventual missions to Mars, the NRF could have practical applications in the next phase of space settlement when humans have established a beachhead on the moon and are ready push out into the solar system.
The vehicle was designed to enable safe human proximity EVA operations around a NEA independent of the type of asteroid. Another primary design objective was to investigate, test and validate the use of key technologies for deep space exploration including the ability to collect surface and core samples storing them so that they could be analyzed on Earth. Finally, the platform was envisioned to have the ability to perform in-situ experiments, with real-time data analysis.
* The reference paper was the result of a project within the Alta Scuola Politecnica, joining together students from Politecnico di Torino and Politecnico di Milano. The authors are Luca Levrino, Chiara Gastaldi and Maria Antonietta Viscio from Politecnico di Torino, Italy. Alessandro Ciani, Margherita Censi, Alessandro Cingoli, and Paolo Maggiore from Politecnico di Milano, Italy. Ricardo Repenning from Technische Universität München, Germany
Credits: Kevin Cannon / https://eatlikeamartian.org/
Kevin Cannon shows you how with his Eat Like a Martian project. In a Tweet today, the planetary geologist and postdoctoral researcher at University of Central Florida announced plans for revamping his website as well as other R&D and educational outreach activities to be managed by undergraduate students. According to the website, “The ‘Martian Diet’ offers environmental and ethical benefits over traditional Western habits: no mass suffering of caged animals, and sharp cuts in land, water, energy use, and carbon emissions.”
